International Journal of Climatology
VALUE SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE

Challenges to link climate change data provision and user needs: Perspective from the COST‐action VALUE

O. Rössler

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: ole.roessler@giub.unibe.ch

Institute for Geography, Oeschger Centre of Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Correspondence

O. Rössler, Institute of Geography, Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Hallerstrasse 12, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.

Email: ole.roessler@giub.unibe.ch

Search for more papers by this author
A. M. Fischer

Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
H. Huebener

Hessian Agency for Nature Conservation, Environment and Geology, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
D. Maraun

Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change, University of Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
R. E. Benestad

The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
P. Christodoulides

Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus

Search for more papers by this author
P. M. M. Soares

Instituto Dom Luiz, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
R. M. Cardoso

Instituto Dom Luiz, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
C. Pagé

UMR CNRS 5318 CECI – CERFACS, Toulouse, France

Search for more papers by this author
H. Kanamaru

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
F. Kreienkamp

Deutscher Wetterdienst, Potsdam, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
D. Vlachogiannis

Environmental Research Laboratory, NCSR Demokritos, Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 April 2017
Citations: 11
Funding information EU COST Action ES1102, Grant/Award Number: EU FP7, EU COST Action ES1102
Get access to the full version of this article. View access options below.
Institutional Login
Loading institution options...

If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, .

    • View the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures for a period of 48 hours.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article can not be printed.
    • Article can not be downloaded.
    • Article can not be redistributed.
    • Unlimited viewing of the article/chapter PDF and any associated supplements and figures.
    • Article/chapter can be printed.
    • Article/chapter can be downloaded.
    • Article/chapter can not be redistributed.

Abstract

The application of climate change impact assessment (CCIA) studies in general and especially the linkages between different actor groups typically involved is often not trivial and subject to many limitations and uncertainties. Disciplinary issues like competing downscaling approaches, imperfect climate and impact model data and uncertainty propagation as well as the selection of appropriate data sets are only one part of the story. Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary challenges add to these, as climate data and impact model data provision and their usage require at least a minimum of common work and shared understanding among actors. Here, we provide the VALUE perspective on current disciplinary challenges and limitations at the downscaling interface and elaborate transdisciplinary issues that hamper a proper working downscaling interface. The perspective is partly based on a survey on user needs of downscaled data that was distributed among 62 participants across Europe involving 22 sectors. Partly, it is based on the exchanges and experiences gained during the lifetime of VALUE that brought together different actor groups of different disciplines: climate modellers, impact modellers, statisticians and stakeholders. We outline a sketch that summarizes the linkages between the main identified actor groups: climate model data providers, impact modellers and societal users. We summarize review and structure current actors groups, needs and issues. We argue that this structuring enables involved actors to tackle these issues in a more organized and hence effective way. A key solution to several difficulties at the downscaling interface is to our understanding the development of guidelines based on benchmark tests like the VALUE framework. In addition, fostering communication between actor groups—and financing this communication—is essential to obtain the best possible CCIA as a prerequisite for robust adaptation.