Volume 142, Issue 696 p. 1413-1427
Research Article

The Climate-system Historical Forecast Project: do stratosphere-resolving models make better seasonal climate predictions in boreal winter?

Amy H. Butler,

Corresponding Author

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Earth Systems Research Laboratory/Chemical Sciences Division, Boulder, CO, USA

Correspondence to: A. H. Butler, NOAA/ESRL/CSD, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA. E-mail: amy.butler@noaa.govSearch for more papers by this author
Alberto Arribas,

Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Athanassiadou,

Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Johanna Baehr,

Institute of Oceanography, Centre for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Natalia Calvo,

Departamento de Fisica de la Tierra II, Facultad de Ciencias Fisicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew Charlton-Perez,

Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Michel Déqué,

Météo-France/Centre National de Recherches Meteorologiques/CNRS-GAME, Toulouse, France

Search for more papers by this author
Daniela I. V. Domeisen,

GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, University of Kiel, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Kristina Fröhlich,

Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD), Offenbach, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Harry Hendon,

Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Yukiko Imada,

Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, Ibaraki, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masayoshi Ishii,

Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, Ibaraki, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Maddalen Iza,

Departamento de Fisica de la Tierra II, Facultad de Ciencias Fisicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Alexey Yu. Karpechko,

Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Arun Kumar,

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Weather Service/Climate Prediction Center, College Park, MD, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Craig MacLachlan,

Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK

Search for more papers by this author
William J. Merryfield,

Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis/Environment Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Wolfgang A. Müller,

Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Alan O'Neill,

Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Adam A. Scaife,

Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK

Search for more papers by this author
John Scinocca,

Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis/Environment Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Sigmond,

Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis/Environment Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Timothy N. Stockdale,

European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Tamaki Yasuda,

Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 January 2016
Citations: 54

Abstract

Using an international, multi-model suite of historical forecasts from the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) Climate-system Historical Forecast Project (CHFP), we compare the seasonal prediction skill in boreal wintertime between models that resolve the stratosphere and its dynamics (‘high-top’) and models that do not (‘low-top’). We evaluate hindcasts that are initialized in November, and examine the model biases in the stratosphere and how they relate to boreal wintertime (December–March) seasonal forecast skill. We are unable to detect more skill in the high-top ensemble-mean than the low-top ensemble-mean in forecasting the wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation, but model performance varies widely. Increasing the ensemble size clearly increases the skill for a given model. We then examine two major processes involving stratosphere–troposphere interactions (the El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO)) and how they relate to predictive skill on intraseasonal to seasonal time-scales, particularly over the North Atlantic and Eurasia regions. High-top models tend to have a more realistic stratospheric response to El Niño and the QBO compared to low-top models. Enhanced conditional wintertime skill over high latitudes and the North Atlantic region during winters with El Niño conditions suggests a possible role for a stratospheric pathway.

Journal list menu