Volume 19, Issue 4 p. 405-421
Research Article

The potential long-range predictability of precipitation over New Zealand

Roland A. Madden

Corresponding Author

Roland A. Madden

National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA

National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USASearch for more papers by this author
Dennis J. Shea

Dennis J. Shea

National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Richard W. Katz

Richard W. Katz

National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA

Search for more papers by this author
John W. Kidson

John W. Kidson

National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd., Wellington, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

It is assumed that the interannual variance of seasonal precipitation totals is made up of a component reflecting daily weather variations which, as a result, is unpredictable beyond deterministic predictability limits of about 2 weeks. The second component is any additional variance that is, at least, potentially predictable. The first component is considered noise and is estimated using a statistical model whose parameters are determined from daily, within season, precipitation. Estimates are compared with the total variance and where the total variance exceeds the estimated noise it is concluded that there is potential for long-range prediction. Results indicate that only 30% or less of the total variance at stations is potentially predictable. Countrywide totals do not improve the situation. Persistence of the ENSO signal may be able to help realize a small fraction of the potential predictability or about 5% of the total variance. Copyright © 1999 Royal Meteorological Society