Volume 19, Issue 8 e844
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access

Seasonal and geographical variability of nitryl chloride and its precursors in Northern Europe

Roberto Sommariva

Corresponding Author

Roberto Sommariva

Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Correspondence

Roberto Sommariva, Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Lloyd D. J. Hollis

Lloyd D. J. Hollis

Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Tomás Sherwen

Tomás Sherwen

Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, UK

National Centre for Atmospheric Science, York, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Alex R. Baker

Alex R. Baker

Centre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen M. Ball

Stephen M. Ball

Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Brian J. Bandy

Brian J. Bandy

Centre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas G. Bell

Thomas G. Bell

Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Mohammad N. Chowdhury

Mohammad N. Chowdhury

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Rebecca L. Cordell

Rebecca L. Cordell

Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Mathew J. Evans

Mathew J. Evans

Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, UK

National Centre for Atmospheric Science, York, UK

Search for more papers by this author
James D. Lee

James D. Lee

Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, UK

National Centre for Atmospheric Science, York, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Claire E. Reeves

Claire E. Reeves

Centre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Search for more papers by this author
James M. Roberts

James M. Roberts

Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado

Search for more papers by this author
Mingxi Yang

Mingxi Yang

Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Paul S. Monks

Paul S. Monks

Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 August 2018
Citations: 21
Funding information Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), Grant/Award Number: NE/K004069/1, NE/N018044/1, NE/K012169/1, NE/L01291X/1; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Climate and Health of the Atmosphere Initiatives. The Weybourne Atmospheric Observatory is supported by the National Centre for Atmospheric Science

Abstract

Measurements of nitryl chloride (ClNO2) and its precursors (O3, NO2, particulate chloride) were made in 2014–2016 at three contrasting locations in the United Kingdom: Leicester, Penlee Point and Weybourne. ClNO2 was observed at all sites and in every season, with the highest concentrations between 00:00 and 04:00 GMT. The median nocturnal concentration of ClNO2 ranged between the detection limit (4.2 ppt) and 139 ppt. A clear seasonal cycle, with maxima in spring and winter, and significant differences between locations in the same season were observed. The main source of particulate chloride was sea salt aerosol (including at Leicester, ∼200 km from the coast). In general, ClNO2 levels were controlled by the concentrations of O3 and NO2, rather than by the uptake and reaction of N2O5 with particulate chloride. Under these conditions, the seasonality and geographical distribution of ClNO2 can be explained in terms of O3-limited and NO2-limited regimes affecting the formation of the N2O5 precursor. A global version of the GEOS-Chem model at medium resolution (2° × 2.5°) was not able to fully capture the observed seasonality of ClNO2, mostly because the model overestimated the concentrations of the precursors, particularly of nocturnal O3. A higher-resolution (0.25° × 0.3125°) version of GEOS-Chem showed better agreement with the observations, although it still overestimated ClNO2 concentrations during summer.

1 INTRODUCTION

Chlorine atoms (Cl) are highly reactive in the atmosphere and affect several atmospheric chemical processes: the oxidation of organic compounds (including methane, a key climate forcer), the formation of tropospheric ozone and the cycling of sulphur and nitrogen (Saiz-Lopez and von Glasow, 2012).

One of the mechanisms by which unreactive particulate chloride (Cl) can be converted into reactive gas-phase chlorine is via the nocturnal formation of nitryl chloride (ClNO2), followed by its photolysis at sunrise to yield Cl and NO2 (1). ClNO2 is formed from the reaction of N2O5 on chloride-containing particles (5) (Finlayson-Pitts et al., 1989; Behnke et al., 1994; Finlayson-Pitts, 2003; Roberts et al., 2008; 2009):
urn:x-wiley:1530261X:media:asl2844:asl2844-math-0001(1)
urn:x-wiley:1530261X:media:asl2844:asl2844-math-0002(2)
urn:x-wiley:1530261X:media:asl2844:asl2844-math-0003(3)
urn:x-wiley:1530261X:media:asl2844:asl2844-math-0004(4)
urn:x-wiley:1530261X:media:asl2844:asl2844-math-0005(5)

The chemical equilibrium between NO3 and N2O5 (Brown et al., 2003) and the short lifetime of NO3 during the day, due to its rapid photolysis rate and reaction with NO, dictate that reactions 3-5 are important only during the night. Except for slow dry deposition, ClNO2 losses are thought to be insignificant at night (Roberts et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2014). During the day, ClNO2 photolyses, with a lifetime of ∼40 min (at midday, 52°N), resulting in a diel pattern with night-time maxima and daytime minima. The conversion of N2O5 to ClNO2 (5) has been shown to occur even at low concentrations of particulate chloride (Roberts et al., 2009). The main source of chloride in the troposphere is sea salt aerosol, although sub-micron particles can also contain Cl following, for example, uptake of HCl from anthropogenic sources (Thornton et al., 2010; Mielke et al., 2011). In addition, saline soils and road salt can be locally important sources of chloride (Jordan et al., 2015).

The formation of ClNO2 reduces the formation of HNO3 (due to the competition between 4 and 5) and therefore slows the overall loss of nitrogen oxides via HNO3 deposition (Brown et al., 2006), leaving more NO2 available for ozone formation in the morning; the photolysis of ClNO2 releases Cl atoms (1), enhancing the oxidation of organic compounds and ozone production (Osthoff et al., 2008; Simon et al., 2009; Sarwar et al., 2012; Riedel et al., 2014; Young et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2016).

Observations of ClNO2 in the troposphere have been reported over the last decade by several research groups, mostly in North America (Osthoff et al., 2008; Kercher et al., 2009; Thornton et al., 2010; Mielke et al., 2011; 2013; Riedel et al., 2012; 2013; Young et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2014; Mielke et al., 2016), with only a few in Europe (Phillips et al., 2012; Bannan et al., 2015; 2017) and in Asia (Tham et al., 2014; Tham et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016). These studies have shown that ClNO2 is widely distributed in the troposphere, even away from the coast, at concentrations ranging from a few hundred ppt to several ppb.

This paper presents the first seasonally complete set of ClNO2 measurements in Europe, drawn from three sites across the United Kingdom. The observations were used, together with modelling tools, to investigate the spatial and temporal variability of ClNO2 in the United Kingdom and, by extension, Northern Europe.

2 METHODS

2.1 Fieldwork

Measurements of ClNO2, O3, NO2 and aerosol composition were taken during seven periods between 2014 and 2016 at three locations in the United Kingdom:
  1. Leicester (52°38′N, 01°08′W) is a middle-sized city (pop: ∼330,000) in central England, ∼200 km from the ocean. The measurements were made at two sites on the University campus: the Department of Chemistry and the local AURN station (Automatic Urban and Rural Network, http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/networks/site-info?uka_id=UKA00573), which is classified as an urban background site (Hama et al., 2017). The two sites are ∼400 m apart and, for this work, were analysed together.
  2. Penlee Point (50°19′N, 04°11′W) is on the southwestern coast of the United Kingdom, ∼6 km southwest of the city of Plymouth (pop: ∼250,000). The Penlee Point Atmospheric Observatory (PPAO, http://www.westernchannelobservatory.org.uk/penlee/) is located ∼11 m above mean sea level and ∼30 m from the shoreline. The site receives unpolluted air from the Atlantic Ocean during prevailing southwesterly conditions (∼50% of the time, Yang et al., 2016).
  3. Weybourne (52°57′N, 01°07′E) is on the eastern coast of the United Kingdom, ∼180 km northeast of London. The Weybourne Atmospheric Observatory (WAO, http://weybourne.uea.ac.uk/) is located ∼150 m from the shoreline and receives clean air masses from the North Sea, as well as continental outflow from the United Kingdom and/or Northern Europe (Penkett et al., 1999).

The locations and dates of the measurements periods cover a variety of chemical conditions and geographical areas, from unpolluted coastal to urban environments. A map of the study region is given in the Supplementary Information (SI. 1, Supporting Information), and a summary of the dataset is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Date, season and location of the measurement periods. Median, interquartile range and maximum measured concentrations of ClNO2, NO2, O3 (15-min average between 00:00–04:00 GMT) and particulate Cl (24 h average) during each measurement period
Date 3–11 Mar 4–28 Aug 11–19 Dec 20 Apr-8 May 26 Jun-3 Aug 22–29 Sep 1–26 Feb
Year 2014 2014 2014 2015 2015 2015 2016
Season Spring Summer Winter Spring Summer Autumn Winter
Location Leicester Leicester Leicester Penlee Point Weybourne Leicester Leicester
ClNO2 110 15.4 50.5 <DLa 21.5 27.7 139
(ppt) 50.1–150 <DL-31.2a 23.4–100 <DL-6.3a 9.1–67.4 18.7–41.5 5.5–281
274 74.2 248 922 1,100 75.6 733
NO2 9.0 8.6 6.8 0.9 2.7 13.1 7.9
(ppb) 5.8–21.6 4.4–14.1 5.3–11.4 0.4–1.9 1.6–3.8 6.0–19.6 5.1–20.5
33.5 26.4 38.3 6.3 9.4 32.9 43.4
O3 24.2 17.0 23.2 39.0 26.7 8.4 22.1
(ppb) 15.7–28.9 11.4–21.3 18.6–29.0 32.5–42.8 22.3–32.3 3.3–15.7 11.3–29.6
35.7 30.3 34.9 50.3 82.7 26.7 39.8
Clc 0.7 <DLb 1.3 2.3
(μg/m3) 0.4–1.2 <DL-0.6b 1.1–1.5 1.5–4.8
2.6 2.0 1.6 22.2
  • a Detection limit (DL) = 4.2 ppt.
  • b Detection limit (DL) = 0.2 μg/m3.
  • c Particle diameter <10 μm (PM10) for the Leicester data and >0.01 μm for the Weybourne data.

2.2 Instruments

ClNO2 was measured by Chemical Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (CIMS). The Leicester CIMS instrument (THS Instruments LLC, GA) was operated in negative ion mode, with a configuration similar to Liao et al. (2011), using iodide (I) as the reagent ion. ClNO2 was detected as the cluster ion [I.ClNO2] at m/z = 208 and 210 amu, as in Osthoff et al. (2008) and Thaler et al. (2011). The instrument was calibrated by generating ClNO2 with a flow of Cl2 (5 ppm in N2) over a bed of sodium nitrite (NaNO2) and NaCl, similar to Thaler et al. (2011). Quantitative determination of the amount of ClNO2 produced was obtained by thermally decomposing ClNO2 to NO2 at ∼350 °C and measuring NO2 by broadband cavity-enhanced spectroscopy (Thalman et al., 2015). During fieldwork, the CIMS instrument's background signal was determined every hour by diverting the sample flow through a heated (∼175 °C) stainless steel coil, which destroys all ClNO2 in the sample. The 1-min detection limit for ClNO2 was 4.2 ppt at 2σ (5.1 ppt at 3σ), with 18% accuracy and 14% precision.

O3 was measured by UV absorption in Leicester (Model T400, Teledyne Technologies Inc., City of Industry, CA, Hama et al., 2017), in Penlee Point (Model 205, 2B Technologies, Boulder, CO, Yang et al., 2016) and in Weybourne (Model 49i, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Franklin, MA). NO2 was measured at Leicester and in Penlee Point with a Teledyne Model T200 NO/NO2/NOx analyser, using chemiluminescence detection with a molybdenum converter (Hama et al., 2017). This type of instrument is known to be subject to interference from PAN and other NOy species (Reed et al., 2016): although this is unlikely to be an issue for Leicester, where fresh NOx emissions dominate, it may be significant for Penlee Point. Concentrations of PAN in clean oceanic air masses are typically lower than 300–400 ppt (Roberts et al., 1996; Heard et al., 2006); with a conversion factor of PAN on a molybdenum converter of 80–95% (Williams et al., 1998; Steinbacher et al., 2007), it can be estimated that the interference was of the order of ∼300 ppt. In Weybourne, NO2 was measured with a dual-channel chemiluminescent instrument using a UV-LED photolytic converter (Air Quality Design Inc., Golden, CO, Reed et al., 2016).

Aerosol composition was measured in 2014 in Leicester and in 2015 at Weybourne but not during the other periods. A PM10 Leckel SEQ47/50 sequential sampler was used in Leicester (Hama et al., 2017), and a multistage Sierra-type cascade impactor was used in Weybourne. Soluble ionic components of the filters from both sites were extracted and analysed by ion chromatography, as described in Baker et al. (2007). Details of the aerosol samplers and analytical procedures are given in the Supplementary Information (SI. 2). All measurements were made at ∼5 m above ground; the data were processed and analysed using R and the open air package (Carslaw and Ropkins, 2012).

3 RESULTS

3.1 Overview

The highest concentrations of ClNO2 were typically observed between 00:00 and 04:00 GMT. The median ClNO2 concentration at the different sites during this period varied between the detection limit (4.2 ppt) and 139 ppt (15-min averages, Table 1); the maximum concentration was 1,100 ppt, measured in Weybourne in July 2015. These observations are consistent with previous reports (e.g., Osthoff et al., 2008; Mielke et al., 2011; Riedel et al., 2012). In Europe, peak concentrations between 50 and 800 ppt were observed in Kleiner Feldberg (Germany) and in London (United Kingdom) by Phillips et al. (2012) and Bannan et al. (2015). More recently, Bannan et al. (2017) reported peak concentrations of up to 65 ppt in Weybourne (United Kingdom).

Median particulate chloride concentrations of up to 1.3 μg/m3 and 2.3 μg/m3 were measured in Leicester and Weybourne, respectively. Chloride was well correlated (r2 = 0.81–0.99) with Na+ at both sites (Figure 1, left). In Weybourne, the measured Cl/Na+ mass ratio was 1.87, very close to the average seawater ratio of 1.8 (Stumm and Morgan, 1995). The size-resolved measurements of aerosol composition at Weybourne showed that the percentage of total Cl in sub-micron aerosol was 5–19% (median = 12%), indicating that most Cl was in the coarse fraction (e.g., sea salt). In Leicester, the measured Cl/Na+ mass ratio was 1.32, consistent with the dechlorination of aerosol during transport from the ocean (Yang et al., 2011; Saiz-Lopez and von Glasow, 2012). In both Weybourne and Leicester, the measured Mg2+/Na+ mass ratio was 0.12–0.13, equal to the average seawater ratio (Jordan et al., 2015). Aerosol composition was not measured in Penlee Point, but the observatory is on a headland ∼30 m from the water's edge, and sea spray is always abundant. These data strongly suggest that sea salt aerosol was the main source of Cl not only at the two coastal sites but also in Leicester (∼200 km from the ocean), providing enough surface area for reaction 5 to occur.

Details are in the caption following the image
Measured particulate Cl versus Na+ (left) and ClNO2 (middle); the red dashed line in the left panel is the average chloride/sodium mass ratio in seawater (1.8). NO3 production rate (from measured O3 and NO2) versus ClNO2, coloured by measured particulate chloride (right). Data from Leicester and Weybourne, averaged to the sampling intervals of the aerosol impactors

The mean ClNO2 nocturnal maxima in Leicester and Weybourne were not correlated with particulate Cl (Figure 1, middle and right), which suggests that the concentration of chloride was not, in general, a limiting factor for the formation of ClNO2.

The complete time series of the measured species are given in the Supplementary Information (SI. 3). In this paper, the observational dataset was aggregated and analysed in two ways: (a) data collected in the same place but in different seasons and (b) data collected in different places and in the same season. The aim is to investigate the seasonal and geographical patterns of ClNO2 and of its precursors, rather than the short term (e.g., day-to-day) variability.

3.2 Seasonal variability

Observations in Leicester were made in all seasons and provide information on the seasonal variability of ClNO2. A seasonal cycle is apparent (Figure 2), consistent with the observations made by Mielke et al. (2016) in Calgary (Canada). The highest median ClNO2 concentrations were observed in spring (110 ppt) and in winter (50.5–139 ppt) and the lowest in summer (15.4 ppt) (Table 1).

Details are in the caption following the image
Average diel profiles of ClNO2, NO2 and O3 in different seasons and locations. The shaded areas are the 95% confidence intervals of the mean. The median and quartile concentrations are given in Table 1

The nocturnal levels of NO2 were similar in all seasons, with median concentrations of 6.8–9.0 ppb in spring/winter and 8.6–13.1 ppb in summer/autumn. The median nocturnal O3 concentrations showed a larger seasonal range and were higher during spring/winter (22.1–24.2 ppb), compared to summer/autumn (8.4–17.0 ppb). This suggests that, on average, the variability of O3 was more influential than that of NO2 in driving the seasonal changes of ClNO2 in Leicester. Furthermore, the NO3 production rate (k1[NO2][O3]) showed a weak but positive correlation with ClNO2 (Figure 1, right), which points to reaction 2 as the rate-limiting step for ClNO2 formation.

The duration of the daylight period, which changes with the season, can have an effect on the concentration of ClNO2 as its formation occurs in the dark. Autumn and spring have similar daylight periods but different levels of ClNO2, O3 and NO2 (Figure 2), suggesting that changes in the chemical precursors are more important. Several processes involved in the production of ClNO2 have temperature dependencies. The mean temperature in Leicester was 6 °C in winter and 15 °C in summer: simulations with a simple box model (section 3.4 and SI. 4) showed that the temperature difference impacts ClNO2 concentrations by 12% or less, which suggests a limited impact of temperature on the seasonal variability of ClNO2.

3.3 Geographical variability

Observations were made in two different locations in spring (Leicester and Penlee Point) and in summer (Leicester and Weybourne), thus providing information on the geographical variability of ClNO2 in the same season.

The interquartile range of ClNO2 concentrations during spring was 50.1–150 ppt in Leicester and <DL-6.3 ppt in Penlee Point. It must be noted that the observations made in Penlee Point were highly skewed: the mean concentration was 66.1 ppt (Figure 2), and the median was 1.7 ppt (i.e., below the detection limit). This was mostly due to a single night (April 30, 2015) characterized by northeasterly winds, when the concentration of ClNO2 reached 922 ppt. For most of the measurement period, southwesterly winds transported clean air masses from the Atlantic Ocean to Penlee Point, and the concentration of ClNO2 was below 6.3 ppt. Although the median O3 concentrations were ∼40% lower in Leicester than in Penlee Point, the median NO2 concentrations were a factor of 10 higher, leading to higher ClNO2 concentrations in Leicester (Table 1). This result is consistent with the spring observations previously made by Bannan et al. (2017) in Weybourne: although O3 concentrations were higher (45–50 ppb) than in Leicester, the mean ClNO2 concentration was about a factor of 6 lower (∼15 ppt) due to lower NOx levels in Weybourne.

During summer, the median O3 concentrations were ∼40% lower and the median NO2 concentrations a factor of 3 higher in Leicester, compared to Weybourne. Contrary to springtime, lower O3 and higher NO2 resulted in lower ClNO2 concentrations in Leicester (15.4 ppt) than in Weybourne (21.5 ppt). This suggests that the concentration of ClNO2 in the two locations was, on average, controlled by different mechanisms, with NO2 being the more influential parameter in Weybourne and O3 in Leicester.

The Leicester and Weybourne data can be compared to the other European measurements, which were obtained during summer (Phillips et al., 2012; Bannan et al., 2015). In London, O3 concentrations (∼20 ppb, Bohnenstengel et al., 2015) were similar to those observed in Leicester and lower than those observed in Weybourne, while NO2 concentrations were generally higher (10–15 ppb), which resulted in higher mean concentrations of ClNO2 (∼150 ppt, Bannan et al., 2015). The pattern was less clear for Kleiner Feldberg, likely because air masses of continental origin were also sampled (Phillips et al., 2012), and under those conditions, it cannot be assumed that particulate chloride was not a limiting factor.

3.4 Discussion

The measurements presented here, and those by Bannan et al. (2015; 2017), suggest that ClNO2 levels in the United Kingdom are controlled by the gas-phase precursors (O3 and NO2), rather than by the uptake and reaction of N2O5 with particulate chloride. To investigate the relationship between ClNO2, O3 and NO2 in more detail, a simple box model was developed. The model includes reactions 2-5, plus:
urn:x-wiley:1530261X:media:asl2844:asl2844-math-0006(6)
urn:x-wiley:1530261X:media:asl2844:asl2844-math-0007(7)
urn:x-wiley:1530261X:media:asl2844:asl2844-math-0008(8)
where RH represent a generic hydrocarbon (with the rate coefficient of NO3 + propene and initial concentration of 1 ppb) and RO2 the corresponding peroxy radical. The model was run 96 times, each time with a different initial concentration of NO2 (0.1–50 ppb) or O3 (1–100 ppb). The uptake coefficient of N2O5 was set to 0.01 (Bertram and Thornton, 2009) and the ClNO2 yield to 0.5 (Roberts et al., 2009). The model was run for 4 hr at constant temperature (285 K, mean of all measurement periods) to simulate the formation of ClNO2 during the night.

The measured and modelled concentrations of ClNO2 are plotted in Figure 3 (middle and right) as a function of O3 and NO2. Although the model is very simple, it is able to capture the main features of the observations. Running the model with different temperature (278 K), N2O5 uptake coefficient (0.005) or ClNO2 yield (0.2) does not substantially alter the shape of the envelope of model results (see Supplementary Information, SI. 4). Two distinct regions with lower ClNO2 concentrations can be identified (Figure 3, right): one is NO2-limited, and the other is O3-limited. The observations at Penlee Point and Weybourne fall predominantly in the regime where ClNO2 concentrations are constrained by the availability of NO2, while those in Leicester fall mainly in the O3-limited regime (Figure 3, left). The highest ClNO2 concentrations are obtained when the chemical conditions fall between these two regimes, which is the case for some of the observations from Leicester and Weybourne.

Details are in the caption following the image
Measured O3 and NO2 coloured by measurement period and site (left). Measured O3 and NO2 coloured by measured ClNO2 (middle). Modelled ClNO2 versus initial O3 and NO2 concentrations, as calculated with the simple box model (right)

This is consistent with the analysis presented above (sections 3.2 and 3.3). As Leicester is largely O3-limited, the seasonal variability of ClNO2 is controlled by the variability of O3 concentrations, and the variability of NO2 has less impact. Lower O3 concentrations also explain why the ClNO2 concentrations observed in Leicester during summer were, on average, lower than in Weybourne, even though NO2 levels were a factor of 3 higher (Figure 2). On the other hand, ClNO2 concentrations in Penlee Point and Weybourne were mostly constrained by the availability of NO2, rather than of O3. Although the two locations cannot be directly compared as the measurements were made in different seasons, Weybourne usually experienced higher NO2 concentrations than Penlee Point, resulting in higher ClNO2 concentrations even under similar O3 levels (Figure 3).

As shown previously (Figure 1, right), both the Leicester and the Weybourne data suggest that NO3 production (2) was the rate-limiting step in the sequence of reactions leading to ClNO2 formation (2-5), which is consistent with the existence of O3-limited and NO2-limited chemical regimes. Extrapolating the results of this simple box model, it can be concluded that, under conditions of abundant sea salt aerosol, the formation of ClNO2 can be either O3-limited or NO2-limited. These conditions are likely to occur in most of the United Kingdom and Northern Europe, as well as in other regions across the world.

4 CHEMICAL TRANSPORT MODELLING

The chemical transport model GEOS-Chem (v10-01, http://www.geos-chem.org, Bey et al., 2001) was run for the period of the observations driven by offline GEOS-FP meteorology with 72 levels, extending to 0.01 hPa. The model includes HOx-NOx-VOC-O3-BrOx chemistry and has been recently updated to include Cl, Br, I chemistry (Schmidt et al., 2016; Sherwen et al., 2016a; 2016b), as described in detail by Sherwen et al. (2017). The chlorine chemical mechanism in the model includes further reactions of chlorine and bromine with organics compounds, ClNO2 formation following N2O5 uptake on sea salt, and heterogeneous iodine cycling to produce ICl, IBr. Reaction probabilities for N2O5 uptake follow Evans and Jacob (2005) for sea salt aerosol (producing ClNO2) and non-sea salt aerosol (producing HNO3).

The model was run at a medium global resolution (2° × 2.5°) for 2 years for the seasonal comparisons, following a 1-year “spin up”. A higher-resolution “nested” simulation (0.25° × 0.3125°, Sherwen et al., 2017) was also run for two contrasting observational periods—spring and summer—following a 2-week “spin-up” for each analysis period. The average surface concentrations for the grid box closest to the measurements sites are compared with the measured average diel profiles of ClNO2, NO2 and O3 in Figure 4. Additional plots are given in the Supplementary Information (SI. 5).

Details are in the caption following the image
Modelled and measured average diel profiles of ClNO2, NO2 and O3, divided by season (in Leicester, top) and by location (in summer, bottom). The shaded areas are the 95% confidence intervals of the mean

The medium-resolution version of GEOS-Chem (2° × 2.5°) was able to reproduce the diel ClNO2 cycle but failed to reproduce the seasonal cycle as observed in Leicester. The model showed good agreement with the measurements during spring and winter but overestimated ClNO2 during summer and autumn (Figure 4, top). However, the model showed good agreement with the summertime measurements of ClNO2 at Weybourne (Figure 4, bottom), as previously reported by (Sherwen et al., 2017). The high-resolution version of GEOS-Chem (0.25° × 0.3125°) calculated roughly the same concentrations of ClNO2 as the medium-resolution version for spring in Leicester and summer in Weybourne, thereby agreeing reasonably well with the observations. Although the high-resolution model showed improved agreement for summer in Leicester, it still overestimated the measurements of ClNO2 by a factor of ∼2 (Figure 4). The comparison between modelled and measured O3 and NO2 suggests that the improved performance of the higher-resolution model was due to a better representation of nocturnal O3 during summer (ClNO2 being mostly O3-limited in Leicester, section 3.4).

The GEOS-Chem results complement the work by (Sherwen et al., 2017), which focused on the observations at Weybourne in summer 2015 and explored the regional effects of halogen chemistry. The expanded set of model results and measurements discussed here, covering a larger temporal and geographical range, highlight the challenges and possible future directions for chemical transport models. A key issue is the high bias in modelled surface ozone, a known problem for GEOS-Chem (e.g., Travis et al., 2016). The simulation of the seasonal cycle of ClNO2 is a significant challenge for chemical transport models. The models need to be able to accurately simulate the nocturnal concentrations of O3, NO2, NO3, N2O5 and effective Cl surface area. It is likely that significant uncertainties in nocturnal chemical and physical processes lead to resolution dependencies in current chemical transport models. The results presented here suggest that there is a tendency for lower resolution models to overestimate ClNO2 concentrations, which may not be apparent in higher-resolution models.

5 CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of ClNO2 and its precursors (O3, NO2, particulate chloride) were taken in 2014–2016 at Leicester, Penlee Point and Weybourne, three sites in different parts of the United Kingdom. The measurements covered all seasons, and ClNO2 was observed at all locations and in all seasons. The median nocturnal concentrations of ClNO2 ranged from below the detection limit (4.2 ppt) to 139 ppt. The highest concentration (1,100 ppt) was observed in Weybourne in July 2015.

ClNO2 displayed a clear seasonal cycle, with maxima in spring and winter. Significant differences were observed between different locations during the same season. Analysis of the dataset indicates that sea salt aerosol was the main source of particulate chloride (Cl). Observational evidence suggests that production of NO3 (2) was the rate-limiting step in the formation of ClNO2, rather than the aerosol uptake of N2O5 and its reaction with Cl. In general, the data indicate that the observed variability of ClNO2 was driven by the availability of either O3 or NO2, depending on the season and the location. The seasonal and geographical variability of ClNO2 can be explained in terms of O3-limited and NO2-limited chemical regimes, broadly reproducible with a simple chemical box model.

The GEOS-Chem chemical transport model at medium resolution (2° × 2.5°) could reproduce the diel cycle of ClNO2, but not the observed seasonal cycle and geographical distribution. The likely reason is that GEOS-Chem overestimated the concentrations of ClNO2 precursors, particularly of O3. Simulations at higher resolution (0.25° × 0.3125°) improved the fidelity of the simulation, although ClNO2 was still overestimated in Leicester during summer. Future work is clearly necessary to improve the representation of night-time chemistry and dynamics in models.

This work, as well as Phillips et al. (2012) and Bannan et al. (2015; 2017), shows that the presence of ClNO2 is widespread across Northern Europe: where there is sufficient particulate chloride and the total aerosol surface area is large enough (e.g., where sea salt aerosol is abundant), ClNO2 chemistry is expected to occur. These conditions are typical of the United Kingdom and large areas of Northern Europe; they are also likely to be encountered in other parts of the world and are particularly relevant for coastal urbanized regions and megacities.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank D. Tanner, G. Huey (Georgia Institute of Technology); T.C. Brown, D. Diec, R. Leigh (University of Leicester); and G. Bustin, P. Chauhan, G. Nicholson, C. Schieferstein (University of Leicester Chemistry Workshop) for continuing help and support. We also thank W.J. Bloss and the ICOZA team for collaboration during fieldwork at Weybourne. Special thanks are due to Roland von Glasow for many useful discussions and for inspiring this project. This is contribution no. 4 from the Penlee Point Atmospheric Observatory. Photo credit (Graphical ToC): Jacques Descloitres, MODIS Land Rapid Response Team, NASA/GSFC.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.